fbpx

A Guide to Australian Standards for Employment Screening

A Guide to Australian Standards for Employment Screening

Employment screening processes are beyond the standard interview process done by HR, recruitment companies or the hiring manager. Employment screening requires extensive resources and systems designed to uncover information that the employer requires to make an informed decision about the eligibility and suitability of a candidate – and this needs to be done during the hiring process.

The more information obtained and evaluated, the greater the chance of reaching the correct decision to employ a particular candidate.

Today, hiring risks are magnified. Most of the HR professionals acknowledge the need for rigorous screening process. Following a few practices and standards, HR professionals can minimize the risk of a bad hire or hiring a dishonest applicant.

The NSW Independent Commission against Corruption (ICAC) Report reinforces the need for a robust risk-based employment screening framework as typically between 20% to 30% of job applications contain some form of false information. Nothing in the report suggests ICAC’s statistics relate solely to NSW or to the public service. They even think there are better screening practices available.

 

The Australian Standard for Employment Screening was created in 2006 as a guide on how to approach this important area of risk. HR should consider reviewing their screening framework to accommodate complementary practices that have emerged during the past decade.

The key elements of Australian Standards Employment Screening 4811 are:

    1. Identity – Sight some form of photo identification. If a photo is provided, a photo identification should be done and re-checked before going further in the screening process
    2. Identity – Verify address history. Point 1 and 2 are mandatory before taking a hiring decision as per Australian standards. Verifying a driver’s license meets these two elements.
    3. Integrity – CV should be checked.  CV of the candidate should be checked thoroughly to understand about the candidate and his past work experience.
    4. Integrity – Referees should be checked. To establish a history of strong moral principles, honesty and decency.
    5. Integrity – Police check should be conducted.  Point 3, 4, 5 aren’t mandatory as per Australian standards to make a hiring decision and to confirm whether candidate has any previous criminal history.
    6. Credentials – Verify qualifications and professional memberships
    7. Credentials – Professional Referee should be sought to verify positions and dates of employmentPoint 6 and 7 are recommended but not mandatory before taking a hiring decision.

As an employer, let’s say you verified a candidate’s driver’s license, qualifications, and professional memberships. Congratulations, you have essentially met the Australian Standards for employment screening.

Is this enough? you know that you cannot really determine whether your candidate is suitable or unsuitable given this minimum amount of information. It will help immensely to have a more thorough screening process.

Australian Standards, even though a good starting point, are more than a decade old, out-of-date and in need of review. This has happened. They will change in the next few months.

AS 4811 2021/2022 will include a ISO 31000 -type risk assessment.

Preemployment screening practices are about to change. Are you ready?

Scope Context Criteria– Is your assessment taking into account: drug use, financial vulnerabilities, data breaches, theft or fraud or sexual misconduct in the workplace (which was not reported to Police), AVOs or DVO’s outside of the workplace. If your company is in the context of a designated critical infrastructure sector, has the assessment considered foreign influence risks – such as state-based espionage or sabotage?

Risk Identification – why not include the 21 dimensions of a person’s background that the PSPF use in which 440,000 people have been screened against in Australia.

Risk Analysis – use the secret sauce: the fair, non-discriminatory PSPF Adjudicative guidelines.

Risk Evaluation – an easy to understand Green (favourable), Amber (Caution) , Red (Adverse) result gives you actionable intelligence.

You can start immediately by selecting one of our 4 different Suitability Assessments – you can get your first assessment (valued at $169) free.

Already doing a Police check … talk to www.cleard.life about a pre-employment screening ‘overlay’ and how we can help you make the right governance, risk and compliance decisions.

 

Read more:

Industries We Serve

1 in 4 fail pre-employment integrity testing (sample 15,000). Is a vetting check some of the Best Business Insurance money can buy?

1 in 4 Complaints to the Human Rights Commission are due to Criminal Record Discrimination. Are you next?

1 in 4 potential employees admit to behaviours that most employers consider high-risk. HR Managers and Risk Managers need to get onto the same page.

Occupations and Cleard Life Clearance Levels – a helpful guide.

5 things every HR Professional should know about Background Checks